advertisement
On TechRepublic: Worst job in the world?
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

Business Services Industry

Ground zero? - increased issuance of zero-coupon convertible bonds

CFO: Magazine for Senior Financial Executives,  August, 1998  by Michelle Celarier

Issuance of zero-coupon convertible bonds is booming. And that makes them a juicier target for the IRS.

The high-flying market for wireless communications offers as much risk as it does growth opportunities. But when Indianapolis-based Brightpoint Inc. needed to raise capital earlier this year, the $1 billion (in revenues) supplier of wireless services was able to take advantage of one of the best deals around: a zero-coupon convertible bond.

This complex security, first created in 1985 by Merrill Lynch, enabled Brightpoint to raise $172 million at very little cost. And given the heightened scrutiny zero-coupon convertibles have been receiving from the Clinton Administration, Brightpoint may have acted none too soon.

Most Popular Articles in Business
Research and Markets : Tesco Plc - SWOT Framework Analysis
Do Us a Flavor - Ben & Jerry's Issues a Call for Euphoric New Flavors
eBay made easy: ready to start an eBay business? These 5 simple steps will ...
Katrina's lawsuit surge: a legal battle to force insurers to pay for flood ...
Wal-Mart's newest distribution center opened last month near the southwest ...
More »
advertisement

Like other convertibles, zero-coupon converts are bonds that can be converted into a fixed amount of a company's common stock at a certain price. That gives investors some of the upside potential of the underlying stock, as well as downside protection based on the bond's return. And with the stock market reaching dizzying heights, investors looking to hedge their bets have been snapping up convertibles of all kinds.

But issuers like Brightpoint are finding it particularly advantageous to combine the features of straight convertibles with those of zero-coupon bonds. Unlike traditional bonds, zeros don't pay out any interest until maturity. That appeals to investors that don't need the income until then and would prefer not to have to reinvest it. Issuers of zeros are able to offer investors lower yields compared with straight debt because of the "equity kicker" embodied in the convertible. Conversely, because of the wait, the yield on a zero-coupon convertible will exceed that of a current coupon convertible. The difference is more than offset by the tax deduction that issuers can take each year for a portion of that eventual payout.

"These products entail a tax deduction without an outlay of cash," says Robert Willens, a tax and accounting analyst for the New York investment firm Lehman Brothers Inc. "So the effective cost of these instruments is below the nominal cost. It's one of the cheapest forms of debt ever developed."

Too cheap to be true? Not to Brightpoint CFO Phillip Bounsall. For starters, the company was able to offer a yield to maturity of 4 percent on the bonds, not much more than it would have had to pay on a traditional convertible. More important, Brightpoint gets tax deductions each year for interest it won't have to pay for up to 20 years. As a result, says Bounsall, "you're saving the cash interest plus an additional 40 percent [in taxes]. From a cash-flow perspective, it's very, very positive."

* UNCONVERTIBLES?

The only drawback is that the securities are issued at a deep discount to face value - in Brightpoint's case, a 45 percent discount, which means the amount of capital the company raised represented less than half the issue's $380 million face amount.

But even that drawback may be an advantage. Reason: It makes the bond exceedingly difficult for investors to ever turn into stock. As with any convertible, the price of the underlying stock must exceed the so-called strike price by a certain amount - known as the conversion premium - before it's worthwhile to convert the bond. And because the bond was issued at a discount, its conversion premium rises as it matures.

"You might start off with a 15 percent conversion premium, but if the stock remained flat, the conversion premium would expand."

The premium on Brightpoint's zero, for example, was 20 percent when issued. And even if the stock stays where it is, the premium will expand to 46 percent in five years.

"The strike price is running away," adds Thomas Patrick, executive vice president at Merrill in Chicago. "Even though you're starting with a premium the same as any other convertible, the holder never gets the stock."

That, needless to say, isn't great for holders of the bonds. But it's good for shareholders, who are protected from the dilution that conversion of debt into equity produces. No wonder such companies as HewlettPackard, Disney, Marriott, Motorola, News Corp., and Time Warner have all taken advantage of zero converts. And despite the difficulty of converting these bonds to equity - and the fact that some are more sensitive than traditional convertibles to interest-rate changes - demand from investors has been so strong that a growing number of smaller, lower-rated companies like Brightpoint have also been able to tap it. Even companies in as bad shape as appliance maker Sunbeam have recently managed to sell zero-coupon converts.

* A SELLER'S MARKET

One of the biggest buyers of zero-coupon converts is Nick Calamos, senior portfolio manager for Calamos Asset Management, which holds more than $3 billion in convertibles of various kinds. But Calamos notes that "there are a lot of very unattractive zeros, where the stock moves up 30 percent to 40 percent and the zero does almost nothing." In the current market, this hasn't been true of those issued by bigger-cap, more-stable companies, which is where Calamos has put about 15 percent of his portfolio. If less attractively termed bonds are being sold despite their problems, that's because "issuers have the upper hand" in a seller's market.