Featured White Papers
- Enterprise PBX buyer's guide (VoIP-News)
- Enterprise PBX comparison guide (VoIP-News)
- Sept. 11th: PCI DSS therapy for the smaller retailer (McAfee)
Business Services Industry
Cash from trash
CFO: Magazine for Senior Financial Executives, August, 2005
Insurance reimbursements for damaged property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) may be boosting operating cash flow (OCF) at some firms by millions of dollars a year. But according to a recent report, the classification of the cash flies in the face of accounting rules.
A study by the Financial Analysis Lab at the Georgia Institute of Technology argues that insurance reimbursements for the loss of PP&E are supposed to be classified as cash flow from investing, not OCF, according to accounting rule SFAS 95, since the original purchase of such items is classified as a use of cash for investing.
According to Charles Mulford, the study's author and professor of accounting at Georgia Tech, insurance reimbursement for damaged PP&E is akin to receiving cash from the sale of the damaged assets, which would normally go back into the investing cash-flow line item. "I won't say it's widespread," says Mulford, "but there are enough examples to know that there is some confusion on reporting of these kinds of insurance proceeds."
One company cited in the report, Network Equipment Technologies Inc., boosted its OCF by more than 193 percent in its 2003 fiscal year, thanks to insurance reimbursements stemming from a flood at one of its leased facilities. Mulford says the proceeds were improperly applied as OCF. The company's CFO, John McGrath Jr., says the reimbursement was solely to cover the business interruption claim the company filed, although proceeds were used to build out the new leased facility. "Even if this were a gray area," says McGrath, "the implication that [our accounting for the reimbursement] is misleading is not true, because of the fact that it's disclosed in half a dozen places in the financial statement."
Mulford stands by his analysis. He adds that many analysts and investors are unaware that companies often include nonrecurring items in their OCF. * K.F.
INFLATABLES
Did some companies inflate opearting cash
flow (OCF) with insurance proceeds? (in $ millions)
Company FY OCF less
End OCF PP&E
Proceeds *
Eagle Picher Holdings 11/30/03 ($0.96) ($8.80)
Network Equipment Tech 3/28/03 (1.79) (5.24)
Spacehab 6/30/03 19.78 2.11
Gulfport Energy 12/31/03 9.38 6.87
Home Products Int'l 1/1/05 (8.03) (9.09)
Finish Line 3/1/03 $31.96 $28.96
Company %
Decrease
in OCF
Eagle Picher Holdings 819%
Network Equipment Tech 193
Spacehab 89
Gulfport Energy 27
Home Products Int'l 13
Finish Line 9%
* OCF excluding to PP&E, as could be determined from the disclosures
provided.
Source: Georgia Tech College of Management's Financial Analysis Lab
COPYRIGHT 2005 CFO Publishing Corp.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group