Ann Coulter takes on Darwin

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Godless: The Church of Liberalism. By Ann Coulter. Three Rivers Press, 2007. 336 pp. Paperback, $14.95.

Ann Coulter is an attractive writer with green eyes and lopsided, long, blonde hair, whose trademark is insulting liberals with remarks so outrageous that they make Rush Limbaugh sound like a Sunday school teacher. This is one reason why all six of her books have made The New York Times best seller list and earned her fame and fortune.

Coulter's fifth book, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, has just been issued in paperback to provide an excuse for this review. Here are some of the book's mean, below-the-belt punches:

Monica Lewinski is a "fat Jewish girl" (Coulter 4).

Julia Roberts and George Clooney are "airheads" (8).

Ted Kennedy is "Senator Drunkennedy" (90).

The four Jersey "weeping widows" (289) of men who died in the September 11 attacks are "rabid" (103), "self-obsessed" (103), and "harpies" (112). "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much" (103).

Diplomat Joseph Wilson, whose wife was outed from the CIA, is a "nut and liar" (119) and a "pompous jerk" (121). He is likened to a "crazy aunt up in the attic" (295).

Cindy Sheehan, the vocal war widow, is a "poor imbecile" (102) with an "itsy-bitsy, squeeky voice" (103).

Katie Couric is a "shopworn sweet-heart" (295).

Liberals are repeatedly called pathetic nuts and crackpots. "[They] are more upset when a tree is chopped down than when a child is aborted" (5). Apparently Coulter expects God to send most liberals to hell, because she writes, "I would be crestfallen to discover any liberals in heaven" (22).

Coulter has nothing good to say about any Democrat. They are all crazy liberals who are socialists in disguise. Her latest book is titled If Democrats Had Any Brains They'd Be Republicans. Here are a few other folks who get pummeled in Godless.

All defenders of abortions.

All defenders of gay marriages and those who think homosexuality is genetic.

"Hysterical" and "ugly" feminists.

Scientists who deny there could be subtle differences between the mental abilities of men and women and between different races.

College professors who teach students to hate God and America.

Opponents of capital punishment.

Scientists who fear global warming.

Scientists who once were afraid that MDS would spread to heterosexuals.

Educators who want to teach small children how to use condoms and engage in oral and anal sex.

Opponents of nuclear power.

The staff of The New York Times.

Those who favor embryonic stem-cell research.

Senator John Edwards. Coulter has never apologized for her slander against him. Speaking at a political action conference she implied (falsely, of course) that Edwards is a "faggot." (See Wikipedia's article on Coulter for the shameful details.)

And so on.

In the last four chapters of Godless, Coulter suddenly morphs into a science writer. The chapters are blistering attacks on Darwinian evolution--the notion that life evolved gradually from simple, one-celled forms to humans by a process that consisted of random mutations combined with the survival of the fittest. Darwin of course knew nothing about mutations, but Coulter is concerned with modern Darwinism, which she is convinced requires some sort of superior intelligence to guide evolution.

In brief, Coulter is a dedicated believer in intelligent design, or ID for short. Among promoters of ID, mathematician and Baptist William Dembski and Catholic Michael Behe are Coulter's main heroes. Dembski, who has a degree in divinity from The Princeton Theological Seminary, was Coulters principal adviser on the last four chapters.

Like all IDers, nowhere does Coulter hint at how God, or a pantheistic sort of intelligence, guided evolution. There are two leading possibilities:

1. God manipulated mutations so that new species arose, culminating finally in humans.

2. God may have allowed mutations and survival of the fittest to produce different breeds of a species, such as dogs and cats, hut new species were created out of whole cloth, just as it says in the Book of Genesis. Like Behe and other IDers, Coulter is silent on how God directed evolution and what sort of evidence would confirm or disconfirm the role of an intelligent designer.

This is not the place to defend in detail what Coulter likes to call the "Darwinocranks." It has been admirably done in scores of books by top scientists, all of whom Coulter considers cranks. Peter Olofson, writing tongue in cheek on "The Coulter Hoax," in the SKEPTICAL INQUIRER (March/April 2007), accuses Coulter of perpetrating a brilliant satire on ID rhetoric.

Let me focus instead on the transition from apelike mammals to humans. Coulter repeatedly accuses the Darwinocranks of being embarrassed by a lack of fossils that show transitional forms from one species to another. Such paucity is easily explained by the rarity of conditions for fossilization and by the fact that transitional forms can evolve rapidly. (By "rapidly" geologists mean tens of thousands of years.) Moreover, transitional fossils keep piling up as the search for them continues.