Health Care Industry
Industry: Email Alert RSS FeedBiased Use of Cross-Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Male Homosexuality in Human Sexuality Textbooks
Journal of Sex Research, Nov, 1998 by Bruce Rind
THE CURRENT STUDY
The errors of commission and omission made by Masters et al. (1985) may be most readily explained as biases stemming from their differing moral positions on Western man-man sex and man-boy sex, respectively. As previously discussed, these differing positions emerged in our society in the 1970s and have become predominant since then. The question arises of how common these biases are in more recent human sexuality textbooks. Rind (1995) demonstrated wide-spread bias among human sexuality textbooks in their coverage of psychological correlates of nonadult-adult sex, in which they typically exaggerated negative correlates and inappropriately generalized from the experiences of girls to those of boys. Based on these results, as well as the strong moral distinctions made between man-man and man-boy sex in the post-1970s era, it was expected that other authors of human sexuality textbooks would also tend to commit errors of commission and omission in their use of historical and cross-cultural perspectives on male homosexuality. It was the purpose of the current study to examine this possibility.
METHOD
Sample of Textbooks Included
Eighteen human sexuality textbooks published in the U.S. were obtained for analysis (see Table 1), including the 14 used in the Rind (1995) study plus 4 new ones (Carroll & Wolpe, 1996; Francoeur, 1991; Greenberg, Breuss, & Mullen, 1993; Zgourides, 1996). Newer editions for half of the original textbooks, as well as the 4 new ones, were obtained from publishers at the 1996 and 1997 Eastern Psychological Association conferences. Dates of publication for the 18 textbooks ranged from 1987 to 1997, with a mean of 1993.5 (SD = 2.79). The distribution of dates was negatively skewed, with most textbooks (72.22%) being published between 1993 and 1997. Although more than 18 human sexuality textbooks were on the market during the period from which the current sample was drawn, the obtained sample contained the most widely used textbooks in colleges and universities, indicating its practical importance.(1)
Table 1. Sample of Human Sexuality Textbooks Analyzed for Use of
Cross-Cultural and Historical Perspective on Homosexuality
Textbook Year of Pages with Examples(a)
Publication
Allgeier & Allgeier 1995 14, 21-22, 488-89
(4th ed.)
Byer & Shainberg 1994 36, 374
(4th ed.)
Carroll & Wolpe 1996 8-13, 17, 20, 22,
(1st ed.) 247-48, 250-52, 552
Crooks & Baur (5th ed.) 1993 275
Francoeur (2nd ed.) 1991 34, 38-39, 441-44
Greenberg, Breuss, 1993 387
& Mullen (1st ed.)
Haas & Haas (3rd ed.) 1993 10, 403, 425
Hyde & DeLamater 1997 3, 12, 19, 34,
(6th ed.) 396-97, 526-27
Katchadourian (5th ed.) 1989 368, 573-74, 576
Kelley & Byrne (1st ed.) 1992 12, 199, 320, 325, 331
Kelly (4th ed.) 1994 26, 313-14, 319
Luria, Friedman, 1987 9, 24-26, 436-38
& Rose (1st ed.)
Masters, Johnson, & 1995 9-10, 373-74, 376-79
Kolodny (5th ed.)
Rathus, Nevid, & 1997 3, 12-14, 370-71
Fichner-Rathus (3rd ed.)
Strong & DeVault 1997 25-27
(2nd ed.)
Turner & Rubinson 1993 12-13, 254
(1st ed.)
Wade & Cirese (2nd ed.) 1991 16, 552
Zgourides (1st ed.) 1996 122, 131