advertisement
On CHOW: Make perfect COFFEE
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

Methods for investigating goal-oriented PSI

Journal of Parapsychology, The,  March, 1995  by J.E. Kennedy

<< Page 1  Continued from page 9.  Previous | Next

1 Schmidt (1974) did not discuss the signal enhancement aspect of majority votes. Rather, he considered the majority-vote trials to be more complex or difficult than the single-event trials because a greater number of individual RNG events would have to be influenced on majority-vote trials to give the same scoring rate found in single-event trials. With this perspective, lower scoring rates are expected on the majority-vote trials because the individual RNG events comprising the majority votes are viewed as diluting a psi effect on a fixed number of trials rather than as opportunities for psi to occur as assumed under the signal-enhancement assumption. The majority-vote scoring rate was suggestively lower than the single-event rate (p = .07). However, the majority-vote scoring rate was significantly higher (p [less than] .02) than the rate of 50.5% expected under the assumption that majority-vote trials are more difficult and complex (see Kennedy, 1978, for details of the calculation of the expected rate.

Most Popular Articles in Reference
The importance of understanding organizational culture
Credit card attitudes and behaviors of college students
What factors attract foreign direct investment?
Libraries Need Relationship Marketing - mutual interest marketing concept, ...
How to set performance goals: employee reviews are more than annual critiques
More »
advertisement

2 For example, with a 55% scoring rate on the raw trials, over half of the majorities should be 55/100 or larger. However, these majorities have the same majority-vote outcome as majorities of 51/100. The information reflecting the magnitude of the majorities is discarded in the majority-vote process, but is utilized in the analysis of the raw data.

REFERENCES

BIERMAN, D. J., & HOUTKOOPER, J. M. (1975). Exploratory PK tests with a programmable high-speed random number generator. European Journal of Parapsychology, 1, 3-14.

BIERMAN, D. J., & HOUTKOOPER, J. M. (1978). The quest for reproducibility: A survey of Amsterdam fast RNG experiments. Journal of Parapsychology, 42, 56-57. (Abstract)

BRAUD, W. (1981). Lability and inertia in psychic functioning. In B. SHAPIN AND L. COLY (Eds.), Concepts and Theories of Parapsychology (pp. 1-36). New York: Parapsychology Foundation.

BRIER, R. M., & TYMINSKI, W. V. (1970). Psi application: Part II. The majority-vote technique - analysis and observations. Journal of Parapsychology, 34, 26-36.

Cox, W. E. (1965). A cumulative assessment of PK on multiple targets. Journal of Parapsychology, 29, 299-300. (Abstract)

Cox, W. E. (1966). Multiple PK placement using 135 balls per throw. Journal of Parapsychology, 30, 299. (Abstract)

Cox, W. E. (1974). PK tests with a thirty-two channel balls machine. Journal of Parapsychology, 38, 56-69.

FOSTER, A. A. (1940). Is ESP diametric? Journal of Parapsychology, 4, 325-328.

KENNEDY, J. E. (1978). The role of task complexity in PK: A review. Journal of Parapsychology, 42, 89-122.

KENNEDY, J. E. (1979). Redundancy in psi information: Implications for the goal-oriented psi hypothesis and for the application of psi. Journal of Parapsychology, 43, 290-314.

KENNEDY, J. E. (1994). Exploring the limits of science and beyond: Research strategy and status. Journal of Parapsychology, 58, 63-82.

KENNEDY, J. E., & TADDONIO, J. L. (1976). Experimenter effects in parapsychological research. Journal of Parapsychology, 40, 1-33.