Methods for investigating goal-oriented PSI
Journal of Parapsychology, The, March, 1995 by J.E. Kennedy
1 Schmidt (1974) did not discuss the signal enhancement aspect of majority votes. Rather, he considered the majority-vote trials to be more complex or difficult than the single-event trials because a greater number of individual RNG events would have to be influenced on majority-vote trials to give the same scoring rate found in single-event trials. With this perspective, lower scoring rates are expected on the majority-vote trials because the individual RNG events comprising the majority votes are viewed as diluting a psi effect on a fixed number of trials rather than as opportunities for psi to occur as assumed under the signal-enhancement assumption. The majority-vote scoring rate was suggestively lower than the single-event rate (p = .07). However, the majority-vote scoring rate was significantly higher (p [less than] .02) than the rate of 50.5% expected under the assumption that majority-vote trials are more difficult and complex (see Kennedy, 1978, for details of the calculation of the expected rate.
- Most Popular Articles in Reference
- The importance of understanding organizational culture
- Credit card attitudes and behaviors of college students
- What factors attract foreign direct investment?
- Libraries Need Relationship Marketing - mutual interest marketing concept, ...
- How to set performance goals: employee reviews are more than annual critiques
- More »
2 For example, with a 55% scoring rate on the raw trials, over half of the majorities should be 55/100 or larger. However, these majorities have the same majority-vote outcome as majorities of 51/100. The information reflecting the magnitude of the majorities is discarded in the majority-vote process, but is utilized in the analysis of the raw data.
REFERENCES
BIERMAN, D. J., & HOUTKOOPER, J. M. (1975). Exploratory PK tests with a programmable high-speed random number generator. European Journal of Parapsychology, 1, 3-14.
BIERMAN, D. J., & HOUTKOOPER, J. M. (1978). The quest for reproducibility: A survey of Amsterdam fast RNG experiments. Journal of Parapsychology, 42, 56-57. (Abstract)
BRAUD, W. (1981). Lability and inertia in psychic functioning. In B. SHAPIN AND L. COLY (Eds.), Concepts and Theories of Parapsychology (pp. 1-36). New York: Parapsychology Foundation.
BRIER, R. M., & TYMINSKI, W. V. (1970). Psi application: Part II. The majority-vote technique - analysis and observations. Journal of Parapsychology, 34, 26-36.
Cox, W. E. (1965). A cumulative assessment of PK on multiple targets. Journal of Parapsychology, 29, 299-300. (Abstract)
Cox, W. E. (1966). Multiple PK placement using 135 balls per throw. Journal of Parapsychology, 30, 299. (Abstract)
Cox, W. E. (1974). PK tests with a thirty-two channel balls machine. Journal of Parapsychology, 38, 56-69.
FOSTER, A. A. (1940). Is ESP diametric? Journal of Parapsychology, 4, 325-328.
KENNEDY, J. E. (1978). The role of task complexity in PK: A review. Journal of Parapsychology, 42, 89-122.
KENNEDY, J. E. (1979). Redundancy in psi information: Implications for the goal-oriented psi hypothesis and for the application of psi. Journal of Parapsychology, 43, 290-314.
KENNEDY, J. E. (1994). Exploring the limits of science and beyond: Research strategy and status. Journal of Parapsychology, 58, 63-82.
KENNEDY, J. E., & TADDONIO, J. L. (1976). Experimenter effects in parapsychological research. Journal of Parapsychology, 40, 1-33.