On ZDNet: When Google disowns you
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

Controversy and the problems of parapsychology

Journal of Parapsychology, The,  March, 2002  by Nancy L. Zingrone

<< Page 1  Continued from page 21.  Previous | Next

MACKENZIE, D. (1999b). The zero-sum assumption. Social Studies of Science, 29, 223-234.

MARKWICK, B. (1990). The Spinelli database. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 56, 225-228.

MARTIN, B., & RICHARDS, E. (1995). Scientific knowledge, controversy and public decision making. In S. E. Jasanoff, C. E. Markle, J. C Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 506-526). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

MCMULLIN, E. (1987). Scientific Controversy and its termination. In H Tristam, H. T. Engelhardt, & A. L. Caplan (Eds.), Scientific controversies: Case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science (pp 49-92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

MEDHURST, R. C. (1968). The fraudulent experimenter: Professor Han sel's case against psychical research. Journal of the Society for Psychica Research, 44, 217-232.

MERTON, R. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In R. K.

Merton, The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267-278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

MILTON, J., & WISEMAN, R. (1999). Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 398-391.

MILTON, J., & WISEMAN, R. (2001). Does psi exist? Reply to Storm and Ertel. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 434-438.

MITROFF, I. I. (1974). Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study in the ambivalence of scientists. American Sociological Review, 39, 579-595.

MULKAY, M. (1975). Norms and ideology in science. Social Science Information, 15, 637-656.

MYERS, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

NELKIN, D. (1971). Nuclear power and its critics: The Cayahuga Lake controversy. Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press.

NELKIN, D. (1972). The university and military research; Moral politics at MIT Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press.

NELKIN, D. (1975). The political impact of technical expertise. Social Studies of Science, 5, 35-54.

NELKIN, D. (1992). Controversy: Politics of technical decisions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

NELKIN, D. (1995). Scientific controversies: The dynamics of public disputes in the United States. In S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Peterson, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology (pp. 444-456). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

PICKERING, A. (1982). Interests and analogies. In B. Barnes & D. Edge (Eds.), Science in context: Readings in the sociology of science (pp. 125-146). London: Open University Press.

POPPER, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1934)

POPPER, K. (1970). Normal science and its dangers. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 51-58). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

PRATT, J. G., RHINE, J. B., SMITH, B., & GREENWOOD, J. (1940). Extransensory perception after sixty years. Boston: Bruce Humphries.