advertisement
On TechRepublic: 19 words you don't want in your resume
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

Variation in the application of the "promiscuous female" stereotype and the nature of the application domain: influences on sexual harassment judgments after exposure to the Jerry Springer Show

Sex Roles: A Journal of Research,  April, 2005  by Tara Ferguson,  Jeff Berlin,  Erica Noles,  James Johnson,  William Reed,  C. Vincent Spicer

<< Page 1  Continued from page 12.  Previous | Next

(5) Although the clips did not differ in the women's attractiveness or the raters' interest level, there may have been other differences that could have influenced participants' responses. However, mediational analyses indicate that perceptions of promiscuity mediated the impact of exposure on the various responses, which suggests that the promiscuity differences were the major factor that influenced participants' responses.

REFERENCES

Allen, M., Emmers, T., & Gebhardt, L. (1995). Exposure to pornography and acceptance of rape myths. Journal of Communication, 45, 5-26.

Baker, D., Terpstra, D., & Cutler, B. (1990). Perceptions of sexual harassment: A re-examination of gender differences. Journal of Psychology, 124, 409-416.

Most Popular Articles in Health
Fuel your workout: exercisers who eat before they work out have more energy ...
Soothe a dry, itchy scalp: 5 easy expert solutions
Cocktails and calories: Beer, wine and liquor calories can really add up. ...
The sour truth about apple cider vinegar - evaluation of therapeutic use
The, six best supplements you've never heard of: these secret weapons can ...
More »
advertisement

Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.

Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Beuf, A. (1974). Doctor, lawyer, household drudge. Journal of Communication, 24, 142-145.

Bursik, K. (1992). Perceptions of sexual harassment in an academic context. Sex Roles, 27, 401-412.

Cash, T. F., Cash, D. W., & Butters, J. W. (1983). "Mirror, mirror on the wall ...?" Contrast effects and self-evaluations of physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 351-358.

Castellow, W. A., Wuensch, K. I., & Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgments. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 547-562.

Check, J., & Malamuth, N. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger vs. acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344-356.

Devine, P., & Monteith, M. (1993). The role of discrepancy-associated affect in prejudice reduction. In D. Mackie & D. Hamilton (Eds.). Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 317-344). San Diego: Academic Press.

Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.

Donnerstein, E., Linz, D., & Penrod, S. (1987). The question of pornography. New York: Free Press.

Donnerstein, E., & Malamuth, N. (1997). Pornography: Its consequences on the observer. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Emerson, R. A. (2002). "Where my girls at?" Negotiating Black womanhood in music videos. Gender and Society, 16, 115-135.

Fiske, S. T., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 173-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.