On CNET: EA's latest launch: Spore
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement
Featured White Papers
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

"A living death": gothic signification and the nadir in The Marrow of Tradition - Charles W. Chesnutt - Critical Essay

MELUS,  Winter, 2002  by Gerald Ianovici

In his letter to Walter Hines Page dated 22 March 1899, Charles W. Chesnutt expressed dismay at the steady erosion of blacks' civil rights in turn-of-the-century America. Referring specifically to North Carolina's adoption of the "grandfather" clause that had been used to disenfranchise black male residents of several southern states, a law the Supreme Court upheld in Williams v. Mississippi (1898), Chesnutt worried about the growing hostilities confronting black Americans. In language that displays mistrust of the jurisprudential wisdom of the nation's highest court, Chesnutt finds its decision to be but one more abuse of blacks:

   the Supreme Court of the United States is a dangerous place for a
   colored man to seek justice. He may go there with maimed rights; he
   is apt to come away with none at all, and with an adverse decision
   shutting out even the hope of any future protection there; for the
   doctrine of stare decisis [the legal doctrine stipulating adherence
   to precedence] is as strongly intrenched [sic] there as the hopeless
   superiority of the Anglo-Saxon is in the Southern States. ("To Be an
   Author" 121)

As this passage makes clear, by the late 1890s, and especially following Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), Chesnutt, like many African Americans, found the Supreme Court tacitly sympathetic to racist southern legislation. Beginning with the Slaughterhouse Cases of 1873 and continuing up through Williams v. Mississippi, the Supreme Court proved unwilling to overturn state laws that, it argued, only made possible the infringement of constitutional rights but did not target any particular group to suffer discrimination (Sundquist 237, 421). By deferring to states' rights throughout post-Reconstruction, the Supreme Court in effect allowed the persistent and deliberate hollowing out of black civil rights gained in the Reconstruction amendments.

For Chesnutt, the fact that the Supreme Court had upheld Mississippi's "outrageously unjust and unconstitutional law" travestied the promise of Emancipation and revealed the Court to be a place of disheartening mystification ("To Be an Author" 121). That a black person, in seeking from the Supreme Court redress for "maimed fights," might "come away with none at all," demonstrated the Court's role in restoring the political and social conditions of a quasi-slavery (emphasis added). As Eric J. Sundquist describes, blacks faced a return to a "second slavery" without the Court's protection of their constitutional rights (228). Moreover, as Chesnutt's comment underscores, because of stare decisis, "an adverse decision" by the Supreme Court effectively "[shut] out even the hope of any future protection," thus threatening not just to recuperate white oppression of blacks but to make it a permanent feature of Jim Crow America.

The prospect of permanent confinement to a second-class status made post-Reconstruction America the "nadir" moment for blacks. (1) Lacking legal protection of their recently won civil rights, African Americans confronted the specter of the antebellum South. In the same year that Chesnutt wrote to Page, he published The Conjure Woman (1899), a collection of thematically related stories that depicted the conditions of slave life on several neighboring North Carolina plantations. Hoping to counter the plantation nostalgia popularized by writers such as Thomas Nelson Page and Thomas Dixon, Chesnutt appropriated the local color dialect story to feature the oppressive brutality of the Old South's "peculiar institution." Through their representation of slavery's dehumanization of blacks, the stories deromanticize the bygone southern idyll and haunt the post-Reconstruction South with its repressed history.

Chesnutt's representation of conjure as a black folk-belief system involving the supernatural and giving agency to black resistance has generated analyses of The Conjure Woman as gothic fiction. In his discussion of the story collection, Robert Hemenway argues that slavery can be seen as "an extreme form of Gothic entrapment" (113). In this view Hemenway is not alone: several recent critics have claimed the representation of slavery as entrapment in extremis to be a generative condition for the American gothic. (2) Hemenway shows how The Conjure Woman reverses the racist color-coding of traditional gothic signification by aligning innocence with blackness and corruption with whiteness. This realignment, he contends, generates a gothic tropics grounded in American slavery, with (southern) whites cast as evil persecutors and blacks as their persecuted victims. In doing this, Chesnutt replaces an alien "Gothic psychology" inherited from Europe with a "Gothic sociology" that is distinctly American (Hemenway 101). "The demonic function in the stories," Hemenway writes, "is performed by white men who perpetuate the institution of slavery, becoming so many demons to the Black men and women who suffer from their zeal" (118).

Hemenway describes at length the salience of The Conjure Woman's gothic elements, yet he finally concludes that gothic narration remained "inadequate" to Chesnutt's larger literary project (101). As a prosperous middle-class African American, Chesnutt appreciated conjure as a cultural form that had enabled blacks to survive slavery but which was destined to wither as African Americans became better educated, joined the ranks of the upwardly mobile, and gradually put the experience of slavery behind them. Chesnutt's gothic figuration, according to Hemenway, was designed to locate conjure historically as an expression of slave culture, that is, as something safely distanced in the past (119). (3) Even when figured as a means of resisting the brutality of slavery, conjure jeopardized black identity because it showcased an African American primitivism that resonated in the white (supremacist) imagination as savagery. For someone who viewed literature as the medium by which to display hard-working, law-abiding middle-class blacks and thereby effect white acceptance of former slaves and their descendants as citizens (if not equals), supernatural subject matter could only be represented as a thing of the past.