advertisement
On The Insider: Sarah Jessica Parker's Mole Removed
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

Embracing today's global economy

USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education),  Sept, 2005  by John A. Challenger

CENTURIES AGO, a group of Peruvian Indians were looking out from the ocean shoreline. Something appeared far away that they did not recognize. Seeing the sails of Spanish invaders on the horizon, they talked about it and, lacking a better answer, explained what they saw as a freak of nature and went on about their business. Their limited life experience did not include sailing ships. So, they screened out what they failed to understand--and let disaster in.

As we see the sails of the global economy on the horizon, will we screen out what we do not understand (or accept) and just go about our business, or will we anticipate what is happening and adapt ourselves to a world that is changing right before our eyes? The answer will make all the difference in making the most of the opportunities that lie ahead.

Most Popular Articles in News
The Ten Best Laptop bags
Tata plans cheapest-ever car for Indian market
GLOBALIZATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF UNDERDEVELOPMENT OF THE THIRD WORLD
Corn is good for you; Corn is not only a tasty treat, but also a cereal that ...
THE 50 BEST STYLISH HANDBAGS TO CARRY
More »
advertisement

The issues arising out of the wowing global economy are highly emotional. They are about jobs and livelihoods, as well as feeding our families and ensuring their safety and well-being in a world that presents threats, but also great opportunities.

As a start, let us discuss what really is happening in outsourcing and why. Countries such as India and China have vast pools of skilled and well-educated workers available to the U.S. and other countries. The first trend is for U.S. firms to source jobs abroad rather than at home. The second trend is companies taking advantage of advanced computer technology to import services from other nations, like having radiologists in Bangalore read X-rays taken in Boston.

Companies are outsourcing jobs and importing services to cut costs, increase productivity, and meet their customers' demands for low-price, high-quality goods and services. In doing this, they are saving money and investing some of it in research and development to improve products and services as well as create better-paying jobs.

All of this makes good sense. With the tree flow of information available to us, we are able to shop around and select the best companies to provide what we want, when we want it. These enterprises produce high quality and low price. They attract more customers and top-notch employees--and they create jobs.

Sometimes those jobs are created in the U.S.--and sometimes offshore. This gives me the chance to dispel one prevalent myth: that when a U.S.-based company creates jobs offshore, we are losing American jobs. The fact is, these ,jobs would not have been created domestically in the first place. These are jobs that are created in those markets, or not at all. If IBM is going to penetrate international markets, it cannot do that unless it is part of those markets. They must be close to their customers if they are to be successful, and that means sourcing outside the U.S. and inside those markets. That does not mean, however, that IBM will not be creating jobs in the U.S. as well, which, in fact, it is doing.

Fears of job loss are nothing new. This keeps surfacing in different forms. There was permanent job loss when we moved from an agrarian to an industrialized economy. In the 1980s, we saw manufacturing jobs lost and service jobs gained. In the 1990s. companies were going to de-layer middle management and bureaucracy forever. A few years later, we panicked about e-commerce and dot-coms annihilating old-economy jobs. At present, the monster in the closet is outsourcing. Fear is growing that there will be significant and permanent loss of highly-skilled jobs to the rest of the world.

Outsourcing debate

The emotional debate about outsourcing has obscured the fact that it is a natural and normal part of a free market system and a fundamental component of competing successfully in the global economy. Yet, when we lose our job or see a colleague lose his or hers, it is easy to feel overwhelmed and traumatized. The hard troth, however, is that permanent, lifetime jobs no longer exist. All positions, in some sense, are temporary. That means that all of us will lace job transitions from time to time.

Cyclical job shifts are a fact of life in a free-market economy that constantly is innovating and advancing. We are continuing our shift from an industrialized to a services economy--and we not only are surviving this evolutionary step in the economic cycle, we are thriving. We saw almost 2,500,000 jobs created each year in the 1990s during the long boom. Since February, 2001, though, the same number of positions have been lost.

Every time the U.S. has experienced dramatic changes like these in the past, people have tried to stop them. This instance is no different, although, just as our predecessors have found, it is futile to try to stop the natural progression of the economy toward globalization. It is like standing in the middle of the freeway hoping to slow down traffic. You cannot stop it. You may not like what you see on the horizon, but to move forward, you must, at some point, embrace the change.

The movement toward a global economy and workforce will be filled with disruptions and hardships. Still. there are things we can do to minimize the pain and capitalize on the opportunities before us. In the U.S., we have created mechanisms to help people move from jobs that are destroyed to jobs that are created. We certainly do not relish the disruptions that these shifts bring, but we have effective ways to deal with them. Jobs will be lost--but the former employees can and will be employed again and again and again.