Most Popular White Papers
- Business Decision Making Simulation
- Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 for Non-Accelerated Filers: Applying a Top-Down, Risk-Based Approach
- Building Your Brand: 5 Steps To Building A Strong Brand & An Optimized Customer Experience
- Reducing Recruitment Spend: Smart Steps To Find Great Candidates
- E-Commerce: 6 Of The Most Successful Internet Business Models
A tale of two Carlyles
USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education), March, 2005 by Chris Ullman
SECRETIVE: POWERFUL: politically well-connected: ex-president's club--these are words critics and the media use to describe The Carlyle Group. Successful: conservative: building value: integrity--these are words we use to describe ourselves. There are two stories about Carlyle: the one about a respected global institution that has gained the confidence of the world's major public pension funds and another concerning a superficial, unsubstantiated image portrayed by the likes of moviemaker Michael Moore.
Why has Carlyle supplanted the Trilateral Commission as conspiracy theorists' object of affection? Why are websites dedicated to "outing" Carlyle, imploring the world to beware the influence-peddling war profiteers? Why are books written about us? Why are anti-war protests conducted outside our offices? Why did Moore set his sights on us in "Fahrenheit 9-11?"
Simply put, Carlyle is an easy target. Our newfound infamy can be traced to a fascinating confluence of events that culminated on 9-11. First, we have had a handful of former senior government officials affiliated with us, including former Pres. George H.W. Bush, whose son was, and still is, president. Second, we are experts in defense investing. Third, we already were considered mysterious because we rarely spoke to the media. Finally, a half brother of terrorist Osama bin Laden was in attendance at our annual Washington, D.C., investor conference on Sept. 11, 2001.
Individually, each factor is interesting--and easily explained. Taken together, however, they are irresistible to the media, public, anti-America block, anti-Bush crowd, and, of course, the ever-growing chorus of conspiracy theorists.
What particularly is curious about how this story, has played out over the past three-plus years is that no legitimate news organization ever has accused us of wrongdoing: they typically just reference the crazy websites and put in obligatory quotes of condemnation from self-appointed "good government" advocates. Even the conspiracy websites rely mostly on innuendo rather than evidence of wrongdoing.
In fact, Carlyle never has been accused of, charged with, or sanctioned by any government agency for any wrongdoing. Meanwhile, every major Wall Street firm has paid significant fines for securities law infractions.
Media conspiracy theories
I started at The Carlyle Group as vice president for corporate communications in November, 2001. By then, the media and conspiracy storm was well under way. I joked with my wile that I could add value on my first days on the job just by returning media calls and saying something other than "No comment." I was the first in-house public relations person hired by Carlyle to handle its global communications activities. By today's media-centric business standards, such a low profile for a large organization is unusual. Critics call it secrecy, but it actually is a relentless focus on making money for our investors.
Carlyle is a private company and under no obligation to open its ledgers to the public. Nonetheless, we have embarked upon a campaign of "glasnost." recalling former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev's campaign of openness. This effort manifests itself in many ways, starting with my hiring, the establishment of a 1,500-page website that sets the standard for disclosure in the private equity industry, opening our doors to hundreds of journalists from The Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Bloomberg News Service, and many others, proactively addressing the public's perception of us.
For the past three years, I have marveled at the reaction I get from friends and strangers alike when I tell them where I work. Without fail, I get a knowing nod and a confident, "Yes, I've heard of Carlyle." Occasionally, I get an ominous, "Ooohh, the Carlyle Group." Despite these displays of familiarity, ensuing conversations typically yield ignorance on the subject. Isn't Carlyle a lobbying firm? A consulting firm? A global advisory firm? Most people are surprised to learn that Carlyle is of Wall Street, but based in Washington, D.C., on Pennsylvania Avenue. We are a private equity firm, best known for our leveraged buyouts, which is investment-speak for putting up some cash and borrowing the rest. It is a grander version of buying a house--10% down with a 30-year mortgage for the balance. It is a tried and true process, whether you are investing $250,000 or $500,000,000.
Founded in 1987 by three men who still run the firm today (none of whom is a former senior government official), Carlyle has grown dramatically, offering new products (venture capital, real estate, leveraged finance, and hedge funds) and expanding into new geographies (Asia, Europe, and Japan). We have 550 staff working in 24 offices in 14 countries. Our 300 investment professionals manage $19,-000,000,000 in assets in 26 unique funds on behalf of our 600 investors from 55 countries.
Private equity is a relatively new term in the world of Wall Street, having emerged as an "industry" in the aftermath of the Ivan Boesky/Michael Milken hostile takeover era of the mid 1980s. Perhaps surprisingly, virtually all private equity buyouts of companies today are so-called "management friendly," where current management remains at the helm, typically taking personal ownership stakes. This approach effectively aligns the private equity firm's interest with management's, hopefully ensuring an amicable and profitable relationship.