On GameSpot: Wrath of the Lich King awaits
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement
Most Popular White Papers
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

What would Patton say about the war in Iraq?

USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education),  March, 2005  by Victor Davis Hanson

<< Page 1  Continued from page 4.  Previous | Next

Like the Athenian historian Thucydides, Patton appreciated that the emotions that sophisticated people sometimes think are so unimportant--fear, pride, honor--are, in fact, what drive us humans, and therefore must be addressed in any total war. We chuckle at his attention to dress, protocol, medals, speeches, and theatrics, but this obsession was not vanity as much as recognition that soldiers are proud and sensitive beings, and must be rewarded and punished in visible ways; war being the essence of human emotion. By the same token, military operations are more than just ground taken and held. They are powerfully symbolic, conveying to third parties either hope or dejection when they see armies routed from the battlefield.

Today, millions in the Islamic world are watching the West struggle against Islamic fascism. Perhaps deep down inside they prefer, logically and with some idealism, to live under Western-style freedom and democratic auspices. Yet, nationalism, pride, religion, and ethnic solidarity war with reason, combining to produce far greater resentment against a powerful America, even when it brings the very freedom that the Arabs for decades have said they wished. A modern Patton would not be bothered by such inconsistency. Rather, he would make sure that he not only had defeated the terrorists and their supporters, but had done so in such damaging fashion that none in the Middle East might find such a repugnant cause at all romantic, bringing as it did utter rain as the wage of the wrath of the U.S.

Patton, who was both learned and yet not smug about the power of the primordial emotions, understood perfectly the irrational nature of warfare and the effect that utter defeat or glorious victory has upon an otherwise rational people. No wonder he hated war defined as a purely bureaucratic enterprise or a purely material and industrial challenge, inasmuch as neither can change the hearts of men that need to be changed. Instead, they usually increase the body count and rarely lead to lasting peace. We should remember wild-eyed George Patton in our Fallujahs to come.

Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and a fellow in California studies at the Claremont Institute. He has authored, co-authored, or edited 14 books. This article is adapted from a lecture given at Hillsdale (Mich.) College.

COPYRIGHT 2005 Society for the Advancement of Education
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group