Featured White Papers
- Oct. 14th: Simplified IT with Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) (ZDNet)
- PCI DSS therapy for the smaller retailer (McAfee)
- The rise of Web commuting (Citrix Online)
Rethinking a key biblical text and Catholic church governance
Biblical Theology Bulletin, Spring, 2008 by Michael H. Crosby
Abstract
For years Matthew 16:i 7-19 has been used in the Roman Church to legitimize a certain approach to its institutional form of governance that virtually excludes all the baptized but the hierarchy. Using the historical-critical method accepted by the Pontifical Biblical Commission (PBC), this article shows that this "Petrine" text is absent in its parallels in Mark and Luke. Furthermore, in official church teaching, which stresses Peter's "binding and loosing" as a key justifier for this form of governance, no discussion is made of the parallel text of "binding and loosing" in Matthew 18:17-20, which articulates how this power is to be used in and by the community. Using the PBC's document on the appropriate Interpretation of the Bible in the Church, this article argues that such a selective approach to Matthew 16:17-19 reveals an example of the PBC's warning against texts being used in fundamentalistic ways which support ideological positions.
**********
In March 2003 Yale University's Catholic Center sponsored a conference: "Governance, Accountability and the Future of the Church" (Oakley). In his keynote address, Donald Wuerl, then Bishop of Pittsburgh, stressed the need to distinguish between divine "givens" and human contingencies. In his response, New York Times religion columnist Peter Steinfels agreed. However, he added, the received tradition about some purported divine "givens" regarding church governance may be open to criticism if, given their development in the tradition, they evidence an origin more human than divine.
For centuries Catholic tradition has viewed Matthew 16:17-19 as a "divine given." In this text about "the church," Jesus gives Peter the keys of the kingdom of heaven along with the power to bind and loose. While the text about the giving of the keys and the power to bind and loose does not specifically equate the keys with the power of binding and loosing, as Catholic tradition evolved, these three lines came to justify a certain form of governance in the church (ekklesia) with little or no mention of the other time "ekklesia" is used: Matthew 18:17-20. Here the Greek shows that the same power of binding and loosing given Peter has a parallel in the local community itself; furthermore, both texts reveal that the divine authority of the "heavenly father" stands behind both the Petrine and the communal expressions of power (Matt 16:17; 18:19).
In this article, using the Pontifical Biblical Commission's (PBC) 1994 document, "The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church" (IBC), I will argue that the popular Matthean text about Peter's reception of the keys and the power to bind and loose is not, properly speaking, a "dominical saying" or attributable to Jesus. I will also point out that, because of the way Catholic tradition has divorced this text from its context and selectively used it (to the exclusion of Matt 18:17-20), the consequent interpretation promotes a de facto divinely ordained form of governance in the church without any parallel accountability to the communal power given the wider church itself as found in that text of Matthew 18:17-20. Finally, I will argue that this selective use of the former text at the expense of the latter not only reflects a certain "pre-understanding" of church governance and accountability; it also reveals a fundamentalist approach to the Bible's interpretation in the Catholic Church--the very kind of fundamentalism rejected by the PBC's own document on the IBC. Why this continues can be understood only if it is seen as serving some kind of ideological purpose.
The Appropriate Use of the Bible in the Church
Mark 8:27-30 Luke 9:18-21 Matthew 16:13-20
Jesus went on with Once when Jesus was Now when Jesus came
his disciples to the praying alone, with into the district of
villages of Caesarea only the disciples Caesarea Philippi, he
Philippi; and on the near him, he asked asked his disciples,
way he asked his them, "Who do the "Who do people say
disciples, "Who do crowds say that I that the son of Man
people say that I am?" They answered, is?" And they said,
am?" And they "John the Baptist," "Some say John the
answered him, "John but others, "Elijah," Baptist, but others
the Baptist"; and and still others that Elijah, and still
others, "Elijah"; and "one of the ancient others Jeremiah or
still others, "one of prophets has arisen. one of the prophets."
the prophets." He He said to them, "But He said to them, "But
asked them, "But who who do you say that I who do you say that
do you say that I am?" Peter answered, I am?" Simon Peter
am?" Peter answered "The Messiah of God." answered, "You are
him, "You are the the Messiah, the Son
Messiah." of the living God."
And Jesus answered
him, "Blessed are
you, Simon son of
Jonah! For flesh
and blood has not
revealed this to you,
but my Father in
heaven. And I tell
you, you are Peter,
and on this rock I
will build my church,
and the gates of
Hades will not
prevail against it.
I will give you the
keys of the kingdom
of heaven, and
whatever you bind on
earth will be bound
in heaven, and
whatever you loose on
earth will be loosed
in heaven."
And he sternly He sternly ordered Then he sternly
ordered them not to and commanded them ordered the disciples
tell anyone about not to tell anyone. not to tell anyone
him. that he was the
Messiah.