advertisement
On TV.com: SIMPSONS voices sign, 20th season on
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis

British Medical Journal,  May 6, 2000  by R Wootton,  S E Bloomer,  R Corbett,  D J Eedy,  N Hicks,  H E Lotery,  C Mathews,  J Paisley,  K Steele,  M A Loane

<< Page 1  Continued from page 3.  Previous | Next

The cost of patient time was calculated by taking the average annual income as recorded by the 130 patients who completed this section of the economic questionnaire (12 115.38 [pounds sterling]) divided by 220 working days, divided by eight working hours, divided by 60 minutes, multiplied by total patient time (table 2). Patient costs were thus 5.99 [pounds sterling] for teledermatology and 9.52 [pounds sterling] for conventional consultation.

The cost of patient travel depended on the mode of transport used and the distance travelled (table 3). We calculated the cost of car travel using the standard car mileage allowance of 25 pence a mile (15.5 p/km, Inland Revenue). Patients attending the teledermatology consultation by car travelled a total of 570.9 km compared with 2456.6 km by those attending hospital appointments by car. Total public transport fares were 5.80 [pounds sterling] in the telemedicine group and 55.74 [pounds sterling] in the conventional group. Patients who walked had no transport costs. Thus the average travel cost incurred by patients in each group was 1.89 [pounds sterling] for teledermatology ((570.9x0.155) + 5.80 = 94.49 [pounds sterling] /50) and 4.46 [pounds sterling] for conventional care ((2456.6x0.155) + 55.74 = 437.37 [pounds sterling] /98).

Table 3 Method of travel to dermatology appointments and distances travelled

                        Telemedicine   Conventional
                           (n=58)        (n=101)

Method of travel
  Car                     48 (83)        83 (82)
  Public transport         2 (3)         15 (15)
  Walk                     8 (14)         3 (3)
Travel distance (km):
  Mean (SD)              10.3 (9.1)    26.0 (23.2)
  Range                 0.4 to 35.4    0.8 to 80.5
  95% CI                8.0 to 12.6    21.4 to 30.6

Table 4 shows the cost of all the telemedicine equipment used in the trial (1995 prices) and the telecommunications charges relating to the trial.

Table 4 Costs of equipment and telecommunication (to nearest [pounds sterling])

                                      Equipment

                  Videoconferencing
                        unit         Camera   Connection   Total

Health centre 1        5 999         2 000        199       8 198
Health centre 2        5 999         2 000        199       8 198
Health centre 3        5 999         3 732        400      10 131
Health centre 4        5 999         3 732        400      10 131
Hospital 1             5 999           0          400       6 399
Hospital 2             5 999           0          400       6 399
Total                 35 994         11 464      1998      49 456

                    Telecommunications

                            Call
                  Rental   costs   Total

Health centre 1     535      12      547
Health centre 2     535      12      547
Health centre 3     352      80      432
Health centre 4     352     112      464
Hospital 1          352      16      368
Hospital 2          352       0      352
Total              2478     231     2709