advertisement
On TechRepublic: 19 words you don't want in your resume
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

Eyesight Alone: Clement Greenberg's Modernism and the Bureaucratization of the Senses

Art Bulletin, The,  March, 2008  by John O'Brian

CAROLINE A. JONES

Eyesight Alone: Clement Greenberg's Modernism and the Bureaucratization of the Senses

Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. 534 pp.; 23 color ills., 126 b/w. $45.00

Most Popular Articles in Arts
Art since 1900: Modernism, Antimodernism, Postmodernism
Free-standing cardboard sculpture
What makes a successful business person? Business people who are tops in ...
Take advantage of local advertising: TV, newspaper or magazines? If your ...
Tino Sehgal at the ICA
More »
advertisement

One of the principal themes explored in this expansive book is the hygienic reordering of the senses within modernism and American culture in the twentieth century. The change in sensibilities--the new watchwords were autonomy and purity--helped to generate an appetite for formalism, which in turn prepared the way for what Caroline Jones calls the "Greenberg effect." As conceived by Jones, the "Greenberg effect" is a dispersed phenomenon larger than the critic himself and the cultural authority he commanded. It describes how his particular subjectivity was related to broader patterns of American modernization and modernity, in particular, to regimes of bureaucratization and the visual within modernism. Clement Greenberg's personality and predispositions are not absent from the book, but their role in its intersecting narratives are placed at the service of larger constructs. The theories of Sigmund Freud, Karl Marx, Louis Althusser, Antonio Gramsci, Jacques Lacan, Judith Butler, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, and Michel Foucault--particularly Foucault, it seems to me--figure prominently in determining how Jones's constructs are worked through.

The sweep and ambition of Jones's project, her desire to produce a Foucauldian archaeology of American modernism underwritten by the so-called Greenberg effect, stand in opposition to the two conventional biographies published on the critic since his death in 1994. (1) If Greenberg's stint as a customs inspector is mentioned, it is to draw a connection between the bureaucratizing habits of the civil service and the organizing procedures of modernism. (Of course, earning a living in the civil service also announces an impressive cultural pedigree; Felix Feneon, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Walt Whitman, Franz Kafka, and the douanier Rousseau all worked as civil servants of one kind or another.) And if the stories published by Greenberg in Esquire in the mid-1930s are discussed, it is to place them in a framework capable of incorporating questions of Jewish identity and kitsch. Jones's framework precedes the historical details she chooses to introduce, just as the ordering regimes of modernism--auditory, economic, scientific, medical, pedagogical, and psychological, as well as visual--precede Greenberg's internalization of them. The title of the book is taken from "Sculpture in Our Time," Greenberg's much-quoted 1958 article. "The human body is no longer postulated as the agent of space in either pictorial or sculptural art," he wrote, "now it is eyesight alone" (p. xxvii).

Before he became master of the avant-garde, Greenberg was a master of kitsch. In August 1935 he wrote to his friend and confidant Harold Lazarus to say he was taking a westbound train through the Rockies that would pass close to the site where Chief Joseph had surrendered. The reference to Chief Joseph and his surrender to American soldiers in Montana in 1877 was not idle. Greenberg had just finished editing a biography of the Nez Perce leader for the Press of the Pioneers, which specialized in true tales of the far West and the Deep South, and had come to the conclusion that Chief Joseph was a great man. The predicaments of the Nez Perce and their leader strongly influenced his decision to undertake a detour through the northern states on his way to California. He wanted to see for himself their traditional territories, to look through a train window at the dispossessed land that drove Chief Joseph to lead an uprising.

In the months before leaving on the trip, Greenberg had been reading E. M. Forster, Henry James, James Joyce, Kafka, Saint-John Perse, and Gertrude Stein--these are the names mentioned in his surviving letters from the time--in addition to an assortment of Communist pamphlets and material on Chief Joseph. He was cutting a swath through modernist literature and monitoring his responses: Forster's Passage to India was a major English novel; Henry James shared space on his bookshelf with the Communist pamphlets (a conjunction he relished); Joyce's example in Ulysses was worth following, making him wonder if he should not write a novel based on the story of Tristan and Isolde (Viking Press had just turned down his adaptation of the epic poem--"It's almost hopeless to sell poetry ... to make steady money you have to write magazine stuff'); "Don't make Kafka's mistake and write poems manque," he advised in another letter, "There's no sense in writing fiction otherwise"; the cadences in Perse's Anabase were familiar; and Stein was giving him fits, though "The Making of Americans was different" (he does not say different from what). (2)

These are the fragmentary reflections of an inchoate writer--ambitious, self-reflexive, self-regarding, and more concentrated than promiscuous in his reading habits. At the time, Greenberg was determined to succeed as an avant-garde poet, and, if not as a poet, then as an avant-garde novelist. If he were unable to survive on what he earned as poet or novelist, Grub Street would pay the bills. He would make his way by churning out kitsch. In Greenberg's lexicon, kitsch stood for the products of mass culture that borrowed from the innovations of high culture and in the process debased them. It entailed investments of meaning produced in inverse proportion to the monetary value they generated. It was also gendered as female, as Jones demonstrates in her analysis of Greenberg's criticisms of Georgia O'Keeffe's paintings. At around the same time, Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno likewise observed, in much the same terms as Greenberg, that kitsch traded in faked experience and vicarious sensation for profit.