Taiwanese prosecutors have issued an arrest warrant for Pete Lau, the CEO and co-founder of OnePlus, escalating a high-stakes probe into alleged illegal recruitment of local engineers. The case underscores Taiwan’s increasingly aggressive stance on safeguarding chip know-how and talent amid intensifying cross-strait competition.
What Prosecutors Allege in Taiwan Recruitment Probe
According to Bloomberg, citing Taiwan’s Shilin District Prosecutors’ Office, Lau is accused of orchestrating the recruitment of more than 70 Taiwanese engineers since 2014 in violation of laws that limit business and talent ties with mainland China. Two Taiwanese citizens alleged to have assisted were also indicted, signaling that authorities are pursuing both corporate and individual accountability.
Prosecutors frame the case as part of a broader effort to curb illicit talent poaching and protect trade secrets. The arrest warrant indicates that investigators view the activity as systemic rather than incidental, with a multi-year timeline and a sizable roster of hires at issue.
Legal and Geopolitical Context Behind the Warrant
Taiwan’s crackdown has sharpened in recent years, leveraging statutes such as the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, the National Security Act, and the Trade Secrets Act. These laws can apply when the alleged activity benefits entities in mainland China or risks IP leakage with national security implications.
The warrant for Lau is not an isolated move. Authorities previously targeted Grace Wang, chair of Luxshare Precision Industry, and have pursued multiple cases involving suspected transfers of semiconductor know-how. Enforcement agencies increasingly describe such investigations as national security matters, not merely employment disputes.
Taiwan’s concern is straightforward: the island’s comparative advantage rests on engineering depth and proprietary manufacturing processes. Any systematic drain of senior talent or leakage of process expertise can have outsize consequences for its strategic industries.
Why It Matters For The Smartphone Industry
Lau is one of the most influential figures in Android hardware. He helped turn OnePlus from a niche enthusiast brand into a mainstream player and also holds a senior product role at OPPO, which, alongside OnePlus, is part of the broader BBK-affiliated ecosystem that includes Vivo and Realme. That footprint gives this case implications well beyond a single brand.

OnePlus said its operations remain normal and unaffected by the investigation. Still, legal exposure at the executive level can complicate travel, strategic hiring, and collaboration with Taiwan-based partners, from chip design houses to camera module suppliers—ties that are central to premium smartphone development cycles.
Key Numbers That Frame the Stakes for Taiwan Chips
Industry estimates from groups such as TrendForce and BCG indicate Taiwan accounts for well over 60% of global foundry output and more than 90% of the world’s most advanced chips. TSMC alone dominates leading-edge nodes, making Taiwan indispensable to flagship phone SoCs, radio chips, and power management ICs.
The prosecutors’ claim of 70+ engineers allegedly recruited highlights why authorities view the case as consequential. At this scale, the risk shifts from isolated hires to potential knowledge transfer affecting process integration, yield optimization, and device reliability—areas where marginal gains translate into competitive advantage.
What to Watch as Cross-Border Legal Steps Unfold
Key questions now center on legal cooperation and jurisdiction. Taiwan does not have formal extradition channels with mainland China, and cross-border enforcement in talent cases is complex. However, warrants can still constrain international travel and create pressure if third countries cooperate with Taiwan’s requests.
Official comment remains limited. Bloomberg reports Lau did not respond to requests for comment, while Taiwan’s Ministry of Justice has not made a public statement. For now, device roadmaps at OnePlus and OPPO are unlikely to change, but the episode raises the compliance bar across the industry—especially for recruitment touching Taiwan’s deep semiconductor and systems engineering pool.