A new neurotech startup is making stress reduction something you can measure rather than just feel, with the launch of a discreet wearable device that tracks brain activity and provides real-time coaching to help avoid burning out. You can think of it as a Fitbit for your brain — except instead of spitting out raw sensor readings, the device is designed to provide useful data that’s been rigorously calibrated from its clinical-grade stuff.
Dubbed Awear, the system takes readings of electrical activity from the cortex using electroencephalography (EEG), translating them into personalized insights — and then serving them back up to you on an associated app. The pitch is simple: Catch emerging stress early, intervene with “targeted” guidance, and avoid the descent into chronic strain that sends sleep, mood and productivity off a cliff.
- How the Brain Wearable Works to Monitor and Reduce Stress
- Who It’s For and What It Costs: Early Pricing and Users
- Why Stress Tracking Matters for Health and Productivity
- Evidence and Caution Around Awear’s Wellness Claims
- The Competitive Landscape in Brain-Sensing Wearables
- What to Watch Next as Awear Expands and Seeks Validation

How the Brain Wearable Works to Monitor and Reduce Stress
Hospitals have been using EEG for decades to diagnose epilepsy and sleep disorders. Awear applies that science to real life by means of a small sensor sitting behind the ear, an anatomically ideal spot for what researchers refer to as ear-EEG. The system is especially focused on beta activity — the higher-frequency brainwaves that increase with cognitive load and sustained attention.
When beta remains high for extended periods of time, its pattern tracks with that sympathetic “fight-or-flight” state. That’s helpful in short bursts but corrosive when perpetual. This data is then cross-referenced with context — the time of day, people’s routines, their recent sleep — before the app suggests short interventions supported by evidence about how to shift arousal down: paced breathing, wind-down protocols and task reordering.
Academic teams have validated around-the-ear EEG for real-world monitoring. Research at the University of Oldenburg on cEEGrid, for example, provided validity for reliable detection and evaluation of alpha and beta rhythms during everyday activities [Motrenko et al., BIH 2009]. Awear’s early clinical partnership with a Stanford psychiatry team is studying whether the device can signal confusion and disorientation in post-surgical older adults — an early sign that the signal quality is more than just another wellness fad.
Who It’s For and What It Costs: Early Pricing and Users
First in the company’s sights are high-stress professionals — founders, clinicians and knowledge workers who already measure sleep and activity but lack a true read on their brain load. Early access pricing is $195, which covers a lifelong app subscription for first-wave adopters.
Awear closed a pre-seed round that included Hustle Fund, Niremia Collective, Techstars and The Pitch Fund, with plans to raise a $5 million seed to help scale manufacturing and grow studies. A crowdfunding campaign is planned after the seed — a path increasingly taken by wearables to create community and manage preorders, made popular by devices like Oura and Peloton in their early days.
Why Stress Tracking Matters for Health and Productivity
Chronic stress is a public health issue hiding in plain sight. The World Health Organization says anxiety and depression cost the global economy an estimated $1 trillion a year in lost productivity. Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace has consistently found that about 44% of employees feel very stressed on a daily basis. Those numbers haven’t changed much in the past few years.
Most consumer wearables estimate stress via heart rate variability (HRV), temperature, and respiration — valuable proxies, but indirect. A direct neural signal could add specificity, particularly for those whose HRV falls with fitness level, caffeine or medication. If Awear can demonstrate that brain-driven measures lead to better outcomes — better sleep efficiency, fewer stress spikes at the peak of work, or a shorter recovery period — it would be a significant advancement from today’s dashboards.

The market is ripe for experimentation. IDC estimates that worldwide wearable shipments exceeded 500 million units in 2023, and that the category is increasingly moving away from tracking steps to measuring restorative capacity and mental load. The question becomes which signals actually change behavior — and health.
Evidence and Caution Around Awear’s Wellness Claims
Awear is being marketed as a wellness product, not a medical device; it claims to promote stress management, rather than diagnose or treat. Any prospective push into clinical applications would need regulatory clearance, most likely through the de novo or 510(k) paths of the Food and Drug Administration, with peer-reviewed evidence that its metrics and coaching result in a demonstrable health benefit.
There are practical hurdles, too. EEG can be thrown off by movement and skin contact — how comfortable and adherent these wearables are for longer-term use is important. The company says its behind-the-ear position is quieter and undetectable under hair or glasses. Data privacy is also an issue for machines that use brain signals. Clear policies around encryption, on-device processing and data minimization will come to be table stakes for consumer trust.
The Competitive Landscape in Brain-Sensing Wearables
Brain-sensing wearables have been attempted by a few companies — Muse led the way in meditation headbands, Emotiv made EEG for surveying and developers, and Neurosity is focused on tracking focus. Those gadgets usually rest on one’s forehead or crown of the head, so they are worn during sessions rather than all day long. Awear’s bet is that a behind-the-ear design allows for continual, passive monitoring that fits into everyday life, more akin to a hearing aid than a headband.
More generally in the wellness space, Apple Watch, Fitbit, Garmin and Oura have all added stress features based on HRV, skin temperature and sleep staging. If elbowing in is EEG-driven insight that consistently bests those proxies — snaring stress faster or targeting interventions more narrowly — Awear could carve out a defensible niche.
What to Watch Next as Awear Expands and Seeks Validation
Short-term milestones include clinical signal quality from the Stanford collaboration, peer-reviewed publications on real-world accuracy and longitudinal outcomes linking brain metrics to reduced burnout, improved sleep or fewer sick days. On the business side, look for enterprise pilots with employers and insurers, a manufacturing ramp post-seed round and whether early adopters continue to use the device when it’s not new anymore.
If wearables are going to be the next frontier for the brain, there will be more than slick hardware that determines success. What will matter is whether a device like Awear can give people a chance to flag and catch stress before it catches their day — and, over time, their overall health trajectory.