The Luna Ring 2 aims to accomplish what few smart rings even try to achieve in the market — high-quality health and wellness tracking without the mandatory monthly fee. At $329, it’s less expensive than its headline competitors and relies on a polished app, AI-driven insights, and a confident design. It’s not perfect — battery life and some metrics fall behind the category leaders — but it is certainly worth a look in a world where we’ve been told to subscribe or die.
Design and comfort: titanium build with subtle texture
Made from titanium, with a hypoallergenic inner lining, the Luna Ring 2 has that quality feel and reassuring sturdiness without bordering on bulky overkill. It does have a diagonal ripple texture that sets it apart from the boring flat minimalism most of the category loves so much, and instead of screaming for attention it manages to catch light in just the right way. The included sizing kit makes nailing the fit easy — a must for optical accuracy — and once you’re locked in, the ring stays snug through workouts, dishwashing, sleep et al.
- Design and comfort: titanium build with subtle texture
- Battery life and charging: real-world endurance notes
- Health tracking and app intelligence: insights and cues
- Accuracy and scientific grounding: where it stands today
- Ecosystem and integrations: platform support status
- Price and long-term value: total cost comparison
- Verdict: a strong no-subscription smart ring contender

There’s one design misstep: bright LEDs. The sensors can also shine beyond the ring’s borders if you use them in a pitch-dark room, and we found this distracting during bedtime routines. Smart rings thrive on discretion; Luna needs an automatic dim setting or a nighttime mode that tames the sideshow.
Battery life and charging: real-world endurance notes
Luna quotes 4–7 days per charge, with up to 30 days of total top-ups via the portable charging case. In real-world tracking with continuous heart rate, stress, and sleep enabled, the ring consistently delivered closer to four days. That’s serviceable, but it trails leaders; Oura’s latest model advertises roughly 5–8 days, and many users routinely report a full extra day over Luna under similar settings.
The charging case, however, is excellent. It’s compact, magnetized, doubles as a power bank, and is attractive enough to live on a nightstand. This setup reduces charging friction and partially offsets the shorter endurance. If you travel often or prefer cable-free top-ups, Luna’s case is a quiet advantage.
Health tracking and app intelligence: insights and cues
Luna’s sensor suite covers the essentials: continuous heart rate, HRV, SpO₂, skin temperature variation, step count, and activity tracking. These feed into a readiness score and a dense dashboard that prioritizes clarity and context. Luna Cues — short, AI-generated insights based on the company’s LifeOS platform — translate raw data into friendly coaching, nudging you toward gentle movement on recovery days and dialing up training when your signals look strong. Sleep tracking is rich with stage estimates, movement, HRV, and temperature trends. Most nights looked accurate, though occasional anomalies cropped up — an early stop or a surplus of recorded sleep versus competing devices. Women’s health and stress features show promise, but a few metrics feel version-one, more motivational than clinical.
Accuracy and scientific grounding: where it stands today
The finger-based photoplethysmography is well-tuned to rest HR and HRV, with the support of multiple peer-reviewed studies demonstrating the very strong signal quality at the finger versus wrist for nocturnal metrics. Yet, the gold standard in wearables is validation and consistency in edge cases. Oura has built up years’ worth of peer-reviewed partnerships and third-party validations; Luna, as a more recent player, comes with fewer public studies to its name.
In reality, Luna’s data is more encouraging than clinical. The readiness guidance is helpful and accessible, but the sleep staging and occasional drift in totals all indicate a still-maturing set of algorithms. For the vast majority of wellness users, the insights are directionally useful; precision-seeking athletes or researchers might be better off with a ring that has a longer validation track record.

Ecosystem and integrations: platform support status
The app is sleek and fast, but the ecosystem is still youthful. During testing, there were few third-party integrations, and no direct sync with Apple Health, Google Fit, or Strava. Casual users who live in Luna’s app won’t be bothered by that isolation, but it doesn’t work for athletes who want to centralize training load, recovery, and sleep across platforms.
The flip side is pace: Luna is iterating fast — on-demand biomarker checks, the ability to analyze your circadian rhythm, and fine-grained trend visualizations are present early in the product’s life. Small details, like icons indicating sleep windows or workouts directly on timeline graphs, ensure that data is easily understandable.
Price and long-term value: total cost comparison
For $329, without a monthly fee, Luna’s math is compelling. Let’s assume you opt for a popular competitor that runs about $399, plus about $6 per month in membership. Over two years, that’s about $543 all-in versus Luna’s $329 — approximately 39% less. For consumers put off by subscriptions, the savings are real without sacrificing the core of what a smart ring is all about.
It also comes with the charging case, compared to similar products from some competitors that are sold separately. Add in the premium build, user-friendly app, and extensive tracking, and Luna’s value story is only further affirmed.
Verdict: a strong no-subscription smart ring contender
If you are looking for a total wellness tracker and don’t want the lockdown of a monthly bill, I’d recommend the Luna Ring 2. It is good-looking and comfortable to wear, and transforms biometrics into genuinely useful, everyday guidance. Battery life lags the best-in-class, LEDs need reining in, and some metrics still feel green — but however shaky your current tracking cocktail, the basics are solid and improving.
If you place value on a polished, tightly integrated, and more consistent accuracy from your smartwatch, there’s still one market leader to consider. If the trade-offs in cost control and elegant hardware, not to mention a fair amount of ambition, don’t bother you, then Luna finds itself in a sweet spot: a no-nonsense (if sometimes creaky) smart ring that’s not convinced it has to get everything right at once because there’s clear runway space for it to become better tomorrow.
