For years, the smart money has been on laser printers being less expensive to run than inkjets. Refillable ink tank models available under monikers such as EcoTank, MegaTank, and Smart Tank have turned that logic on its head by providing ink en masse at a fraction of the former cartridge price. But “cheapest to operate” is a matter of more than just the headline claim. Your page volume, ratio of mono to color, and even how often you print can swing the math dramatically here.
Here’s a reality-based guide to what technologies will actually help us become more efficient and save money, and when they are most apt to do so.
- What Really Determines Your Printing Savings
- Let’s Put Cost Per Page Numbers in Perspective
- How Your Printing Habits Tip the Balance
- Hidden Expenses Few Printing Budgets Account For
- Speed, Reliability, and the Cost of Downtime
- Three Quick Break‑Even Examples for Common Use Cases
- Market Context and Credible Benchmarks to Guide Your Decision
- The Bottom Line on Ink Tanks Versus Laser Printers

What Really Determines Your Printing Savings
TCO is the only metric of concern. It combines the cost of purchasing the printer with its ongoing “cost per page” (CPP) over an established lifecycle. Here’s a simple rule of thumb: If Printer A costs $100 more up front, but saves 1 cent per page in ink or toner, you break even at 10,000 pages. Print less than that, and the more expensive model never begins to pay for itself; print more, and the savings stack up.
CPP is measured based on ISO/IEC standards using the default setting, printing one page (A4 size) every day. These laboratory methods don’t replicate all real-world documents, but they do allow apples-to-apples comparisons of different brands and models.
Let’s Put Cost Per Page Numbers in Perspective
According to manufacturers’ ISO yields and independent lab audits from Keypoint Intelligence, you usually use enough ink with a refillable ink tank printer for black text to cost about 0.2 to 0.7 cents per page and color at about 0.6 to 1.5 cents per page.
Monochrome laser printers typically run 1.5 to 3 cents per page, and color laser printers usually fall around 8 to 16 cents per page for full-color documents (again, it depends on the toner manufacturer and whether a separate drum or imaging unit is needed).
The headline: For color pages, tanks are usually far less expensive than lasers. Tanks still win on CPP for black-only pages, but not so much that volume doesn’t have redeeming value in your printer choice.
How Your Printing Habits Tip the Balance
The high constant volume is a case for ink tanks. If you print a few hundred pages a month like clockwork—especially in color—you save serious dough with tanks’ sub‑cent CPP. Example: On 500 color pages per month, a 9-cents-per-page gap versus a color laser works out to roughly $540 in consumables (ink or toner) savings every year, and you would never feel the difference of an extra upfront cost.
Sporadic printing can favor lasers. Inkjets use ink to clean their nozzles, and they will sometimes refuse to print if even a single color runs out. If you print a few pages every couple of weeks, the “invisible” cleaning overhead eats away at tanks’ yield edge. Toner doesn’t dry up, so a laser is more cost-stable for occasional use.
Hidden Expenses Few Printing Budgets Account For
Consumables that are not ink or toner count. Many color lasers employ a standalone drum or imaging unit with its own page life; that gets amortized into CPP, naturally. The tanks rely on inexpensive bottles, yes, but also a maintenance box that holds waste ink and may need replacement. The paper costs of plain stock are the same, but photo and specialty media can really add up and become the total cost for creative or marketing teams.

Energy consumption is usually a rounding error, but it can be interesting to trace. ENERGY STAR stats put lasers at much higher power-consuming levels while printing (often hundreds of watts because of the fuser) versus tens for inkjets, but both are hardly thirsty when they’re asleep. At normal residential rates, this difference is usually only a few dollars per year unless you print in very high volumes.
Speed, Reliability, and the Cost of Downtime
Time is money in high-traffic offices. Lasers tend to get closer to their speed rating on long text jobs, warm up faster, and are less susceptible to quality-mode slowdowns. In some cases, inkjets can be dramatically slower at better-quality settings for graphics or photos. If staff time or client deadlines carry a price, the predictability of the laser can compensate for a higher CPP.
Three Quick Break‑Even Examples for Common Use Cases
Home and school, light use: About 50 pages per month, mostly black text. That’s 1,800 pages over three years. With this math, a tank’s 1 to 2 cents per page savings over mono lasers will save you roughly $18 to $36 total — often less than the upfront price gap — and some of that will be eaten by cleaning cycles. Winner: budget mono laser.
Side hustle or class handout, moderate color: 300 color pages per month. Three-year total: 10,800 pages. If a tank can produce one-cent prints and a color laser 10 cents’ worth, the tank saves you about $972 in consumables — more than compensating for a heavier upfront investment. Winner: ink tank.
Micro‑office, text-heavy: 800 black pages per month.
Three-year total: 28,800 pages. A 1.5-cent CPP spread (mono laser at 2.0 cents versus tank at 0.5) equals approximately $432 in savings for a tank, but remember to account for laser drums or tank maintenance boxes as applicable. The winner comes down to details of the model — and whether downtime or sporadic use is a deciding factor.
Market Context and Credible Benchmarks to Guide Your Decision
IDC has been noting significant year-over-year increases in refillable ink tank shipments of late, which points to buyer responsiveness to ongoing costs. Page-yield standards set by ISO/IEC permit fair comparisons, and Keypoint Intelligence lab testing consistently show a wide gulf between tank‑vs.‑color‑laser CPP. For reliability and energy information, ENERGY STAR qualification reports are at the model level.
The Bottom Line on Ink Tanks Versus Laser Printers
If you print a lot of color, ink tanks are the runaway cost victors. For heavy black‑only volume, tanks can still come out ahead on CPP, but mono lasers can win on uptime, speed, and consistency — especially if you don’t print regularly. Color lasers tend not to be the cheapest per page, but can be your smarter pick when you prioritize crisp text, water‑ and fade‑resistant output, and predictable productivity over all else.
Do the math yourself: figure how many monthly mono and color pages you’ll print, multiply by your expected life span, then apply each printer’s ISO CPP (don’t forget added drum or maintenance costs). The correct choice is the one which reduces your true cost of ownership for how you actually print — not necessarily just the lowest advertised page price.
