On GameSpot: TGS 2008: New Xbox Live due Nov. 19
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement

Brought to you by IBM

advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
Thomson / Gale

The war on cancer

Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients,  July, 2003  by Ralph W. Moss

Scientists Identify Stem Cells As Hidden Cause of Cancer

In early April, 2003, University of Michigan (U-M) scientists revealed that a malignant form of stem cells may be responsible for the development of breast cancer. According to a U-M press release, this new understanding is "a paradigm shift in cancer research," and the University has promised to raise $12 million to further explore this concept. The Ann Arbor researchers discovered that not all cells in a tumor are equally malignant. Only a tiny minority of tumor cells are actually capable of inducing new cancers; the rest are relatively harmless. "These tumor-inducing cells have many of the properties of stem cells," said Michael F. Clarke, MD, a professor of internal medicine, who directed the study. "They make copies of themselves -- a process called self-renewal -- and produce all the other kinds of cells in the original tumor."

The University of Michigan team isolated the tumor-inducing cells from breast cancers, both primary and metastatic, which had been removed from nine women who were treated at the university's Comprehensive Cancer Center. Similar cancer-causing stem cells have previously been identified in leukemia (cancer of the blood), but these are the first such cancer stem cells to be found in solid tumors.

The existence of this highly malignant subset of cells may explain why current treatments for metastatic breast cancer often fail, according to Max S. Wicha, MD, an oncologist and director of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, as quoted in the press release. "The goal of all our existing therapies has been to kill as many cells within the tumor as possible," said Wicha. But this study "suggests that the current model may not be getting us anywhere, because we have been targeting the wrong cells with the wrong treatments."

"As few as 100 to 200 of these tumor-inducing cells, isolated from eight of nine tumors in the study, easily induced tumors in mice, while tens of thousands of the other cancer cells from the original tumor failed to do so," Dr. Clarke said. This shows that truly malignant cells are like the proverbial needle in a haystack in the cancer. In the light of these findings, strategies that aim at simply shrinking tumors with radiation or chemotherapy are doomed to failure. They are based on. an erroneous understanding of cancer, since size alone is not critical. What is important is killing or restricting these active cancer stem cells.

"[W]e need to develop drugs targeted at the tumor's stem cells," says Dr. Wicha. "If we are to have any real cures in advanced breast cancer, it will be absolutely necessary to eliminate these cells. What this means for women with cancer is that, for the first time, we can define what we believe are the important cells, the cells which determine whether the cancer will come back or be cured," Wicha adds. "Before this, we didn't even know there were such cells."

Cell Surface Markers

Cancer cells have a unique pattern of surface markers on their outer membranes, explained Muhammad Al-Hajj, PhD, a post-doctoral fellow who is first author of the paper. He has compared these surface markers to a person's unique fingerprints. In this experiment, he and his fellow scientists isolated particular sub-populations of cancer cells and then injected these into immune-deficient mice, a standard laboratory technique. These mice were then examined for tumor growth every week for up to six months.

Dr. Al-Hajj found that only a small minority of cells from each tumor were capable of causing new cancers in mice. These really malignant cells had a unique configuration of surface markers: all expressed a protein marker called CD44, in addition to having either very low levels, or no levels, of another marker called CD24.

The fact that tumor-inducing stem cells from eight out of nine women showed a common surface marker pattern is significant, Dr. Wicha explained. "Even though it's only nine patients, it shows that the markers identifying these stem cells were expressed in the majority of breast cancer patients in the study. This may not be the only expression pattern on every patient's stem cells, but it demonstrates the validity of the cancer stem cell model."

The scientists repeated their experiment four times, just to be sure. First, 200 cells with the unique surface pattern were isolated from the original human tumor. After these cells produced a breast tumor in a mouse, Dr. Al-Hajj removed that mouse tumor and used similar techniques to then isolate 200 more stem cells from it. These cells were then injected into another mouse to produce yet another tumor. Once again, that mouse tumor was harvested, malignant stem cells were separated from it, and injected into another mouse. Each such procedure is called a passage. "When we examined the tumors after each passage, we found their cell diversity to be the same as the original tumor," he added.

Drs. Wicha and Clarke believe that it is likely that similar cells drive the development of other types of cancer, as well. "What we are working on now is finding out what makes these tumor stem cells different from the other cells in a tumor," Dr. Wicha said.