Content provided in partnership with
Race, culture, nation: Edith Wharton and Ernest Renan - Critical Essay
Twentieth Century Literature, Spring, 2003 by Carol J. Singley
"Triste a mourir" to part with Fullerton and wistful about the passing of time--"I wish I had known you when I was twenty-five. We might have had some good days together" (Letters 238)--Wharton was at this time particularly receptive to the consolations of philosophy, whether romantic (Flaubert or Wagner) or rational (Renan). She would have found appealing Renan's combination of the Hegelian world of reason with the Nietzschean world of revolt and nihilism, leading to a positive morality without God. She was perhaps looking for heroes, which could explain her interest in the subject of Renan's doctoral dissertation, Averroes, the twelfth-century Arab-born Spanish philosopher. Renan employs a historical method in this biography and prefigures the treatment he gives to his subject in his controversial Life of Jesus (1863).
- Most Popular Articles in Arts
- Art since 1900: Modernism, Antimodernism, Postmodernism
- Free-standing cardboard sculpture
- What makes a successful business person? Business people who are tops in ...
- Take advantage of local advertising: TV, newspaper or magazines? If your ...
- Tino Sehgal at the ICA
- More »
Wharton turned to Renan again during another crisis. In 1917, with World War I raging and no end to it in sight, Wharton had to acknowledge that it signaled, as David Jones notes, "the Break" with all that had gone before (qtd. in Benstock 332). The war challenged her personal faith, already precarious, and threatened the concept of civilization that she held dear. Her distress was exacerbated by the death of her good friends Henry James and Howard Sturgis. In the fall of 1917 Wharton read Renan's Life of Jesus, perhaps for comfort and certainly for enlightenment and a sense of history. This book, which provides a historical rather than theological account of Jesus and Christianity, and which refers to Jesus as "an incomparable man," (5) had incurred the wrath of the clergy. Despite the outcry, however, such an imaginative as well as historically based portrayal fit well with modernist times, now more disposed toward solutions that were mythical than those that were doctrinal in origin. Renan's Life of Jesus not only presented a secular image, it joined in the refusal to acknowledge Jesus as a Jew and thus participated in the anti-Semitism expressed by many prominent thinkers of the day and manifested as well in Wharton's writings.
Renan's book also helped to address the pressing problem of culture. The Life of Jesus and the two volumes that followed it describe how Christianity spread among the rootless proletariat of the cities of Asia Minor and illustrate the question that preoccupied Renan and others: would the intellectuals of the nineteenth century lead the masses toward a new enlightenment? Wharton's desire for an affirmative answer is evident in her 1920 travel book In Morocco and in other statements that may be characterized as conservative or even colonialist. On the issue of nation and nationhood, Renan's ideas are relevant to Wharton's. He propounded these ideas in "What Is a Nation?" (Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?), a lecture delivered at the Sorbonne on March 11, 1882, and published in his book Discours et conferences in 1887.
